National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS)
|
PRINT ISSN : 2319-7692
Online ISSN : 2319-7706 Issues : 12 per year Publisher : Excellent Publishers Email : editorijcmas@gmail.com submit@ijcmas.com Editor-in-chief: Dr.M.Prakash Index Copernicus ICV 2018: 95.39 NAAS RATING 2020: 5.38 |
The experimental material comprised of 20 Cowpea genotypes along with eleven quantitative characteristics. The experiment was conducted at Research Farm Genetics and Plant Breeding, AKS University, Satna, Madhya Pradesh during the kharif season of the year2023. Genotypes with eleven quantitative characteristics like days to first flowering, days to 50% flowering, number of pod cluster-1, number of pod plant-1, Plant height, length of pod, number of seeds pod-1, 100 seeds weight, biological yield plant-1, harvest index, seed yield plant-1. The data were analysed for genetic variability character association i.e. correlation and path analysis. The study revealed that phenotypic coefficient of variation was greater than the genotypic coefficient of variation, with the highest coefficient observed in the number of seeds pod-1. The environment coefficient of variance had the lowest values compared to GCV and PCV in harvest index, plant height, number of pod plant-1, seed yield plant-1 and biological yield plant-1. Characters with a higher number of pod cluster-1 had the least influence from environmental factors, indicating a dependency on phenotypic expression. Heritability values ranged moderately for various factors, suggesting that the genotypic ability of strains to transmit genes to their progenies is the most significant factor.
Ajayi O E, Balusu R., Morawo T O, Zebelo S, Fadamiro H, Semiochemical modulation of host preference of Callosobruchus maculatus on legume seeds. Journal of Stored Products Research. 2015; 63:31-37 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2015.05.003
Al-Jibouri, H.A., Miller, P.A. and Robinson, H.P. 1958. Genotypic and environmental variance and covariance in upland cotton cross of inter-specific origin. Agronomy Journal 50: 633-46.
Anonymous, 2021. Agricultural statistics at a glance 2020. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmer Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India.
Bizeti H S, de Carvalho C G P, de Souza J R P, Destro D (2004). Path Analysis under Multicollinearity in Soybean.Agron. J., 47(5): 669- 676. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132004000500001
Burton, G.W., 1952. Quantitative inheritance in grasses. Proceedings of 6th International Grassland Congress. 1:227-283.
Burton, G.W. and Devane., 1953. Estimating heritability in tall fescus from replicated clonal material. J. Agronomy. 45 (3): 473-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj1953.00021962004500100005x
Johnson, H. W., Robinson, H. F. and Comstock., 1955. Genotypic and phenotypic correlations in soybeans and their implication in selection. Agron. J.47:477-483.
Lokesh, G. Y. and M. Niranjana (2018). Correlation and path analysis studies in F2 population of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.). International Journal of Pure and Applied Bioscience,6(1): 279-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.5090
Lush, J.L. (1949) Hritability of quantitative characters in farm animals. Hereditas, 35, 356-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1949.tb03347.x
Massey, P., Y. V. Singh and P. K. Singh (2017). Correlation and genetic variability studies yield components and thrip resistance in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp). TECHNOFAME-A Journal of Multidisciplinary Advance Research,6(1): 51–57.
Mohan. S. and Thiyagarajan. K., (2019). Genetic Variability, Correlation and Path Coefficient Analysis in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) for Yield and its Component Traits. Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 8(5): 1801-1808. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.805.209
Nkoana. D. K., Abe Shegro Gerrano and E. T. Gwata. (2019). Agronomic performance and genetic variability of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) Accessions. Legume Research, LR-450 [1-6]. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-450.
Panchta, R., Preeti, & Arya, S. (2020). Variability, Correlation and Path Analysis Studies in Grain Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp], Ind. J. Pure App. Biosci.8(2), 169- 172. http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2582-2845.8035
Panse, V. G. and P. V. Sukhatme, “Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers,” 2nd Edition, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, 1967.
Pramanik. P., Hrudananda Mishra and Choudhary Haraprasad Mishra. (2022). Path Co- efficient analysis for yield and yield attributing traits in bush type cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.). The Pharma Innovation Journal. 11(7): 451-453.
Sharma, P. P., M. Sharma and M. Vyas (2016). Correlation coefficient and path analysis components traits in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] International Journal of Current Research, 8(8): 35783-35786.
Snehal. P., U B Pethe, S G Mahadik, V V Dalvi and M S Joshi. (2021). Correlation and path analysis study in F? generation of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] genotypes. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 10(1): 203-207.
Sunita (2016). Genetic variability, correlation and path coefficient analysis in diverse genotypes of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] M.Sc. (Agri) Thesis submitted to BHU, Varanasi.
Surpura, M. H. and S. C. Sharma (2017). Association studies for morphological and physiological traits in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) The Allahabad Farmer, Vol. LXXIII (2).
Thouseem, N., B. Thomas and N. Elizabeth (2018). Genetic parameters in seed yield components of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences,7(2): 2268-2274. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.702.273
Tirkey. M., Gaiberial M. Lal, Shiny Phebe Anand. (2022). Estimation of Correlation and Path Analysis for Quantitative Traits in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp). International Journal of Plant & Soil Science. 34(22): 1194-1200. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i2231486
Wright, S. (1921) Correlation and Causation. Journal of Agricultural Research, 20, 557-585.
Citations
|
|
|
