National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS)
|
PRINT ISSN : 2319-7692
Online ISSN : 2319-7706 Issues : 12 per year Publisher : Excellent Publishers Email : editorijcmas@gmail.com submit@ijcmas.com Editor-in-chief: Dr.M.Prakash Index Copernicus ICV 2018: 95.39 NAAS RATING 2020: 5.38 |
1Higher Institute of Agricultural Professions, University of Kara, Kara, Togo
2Laboratory of Applied Agronomic and Biological Sciences, University of Kara, Kara, Togo
3Centre of Excellence for Sustainable Crop Protection, University of Kara, Kara, Togo
The increasing use of synthetic herbicides in soybean production raises concerns regarding agricultural productivity, human health, and the environment. This study aimed to characterize the herbicides used, their application practices, and the factors influencing their selection in agroecological zones I and II of Togo. A survey was conducted among 537 soybean producers across 15 prefectures. Data were collected on the herbicides used, active ingredients, application rates, application periods, supply channels, product selection criteria, and phytosanitary protection practices. Statistical analyses combined Chi-square and Mann–Whitney tests, Multiple Correspondence Analysis, and logistic regression. The results revealed a high diversity of herbicides, dominated by glyphosate (52%), followed by imazethapyr (22.7%), butachlor (8.2%), and nicosulfuron (7.3%). The agroecological zone significantly influenced herbicide selection (p < 0.001). Informal networks accounted for 64.99% of herbicide supplies. Product efficacy, cost, and advice from vendors were the main factors influencing product selection. These findings highlight the need to strengthen technical support for producers, promote good phytosanitary practices, and enhance the control of herbicide distribution.
Agegnehu, G., Srivastava, A.K. and Bird, (2017) The role of biochar and biochar-compost in improving soil quality and crop performance: A review,” Applied Soil Ecology, 119(April), pp. 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.06.008.
Araújo, M.S. et al., (2025) “Optimizing soybean variety selection for the Pan-African Trial network using factor analytic models and envirotyping,” Front. Plant Sci, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1594736.
Asad, S.A. et al., (2020) “Soybean Production in Pakistan : Experiences, Challenges and Prospects,” Int. J. Agric. Biol, 24(4), pp. 995–1005. https://doi.org/10.17957/IJAB/15.1526.
Atakpama et al., (2021) “Problématique de gestion durable de la biodiversité des bosquets sacrés de la Région des Savanes au Togo Challenge of sustainable management of biodiversity of sacred groves of the Region of Savannahs in Togo,” Rev. Sci. Technol., Synthèse, 27(1), pp. 22–32.
Dagnelie, P. (1998) “Statistique théorique et appliquée. Tome 1. Statistique descriptive et bases de l’inférence statistique,” De Boeck and S. Larcier, Bruxelle, 508.
Damalas, C.. (2021) “Farmers’ intention to reduce pesticide use: the role of perceived risk of loss in the model of the planned behavior theory,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res, 28, pp. 35278–35285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13183-3.
Damalas, C.A. and Koutroubas, S.D. (2016) “Farmers ’ Exposure to Pesticides : Toxicity Types and Ways of Prevention,” 4(1), p. 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics4010001.
Dantsey-Barry et al., (2007) “Rapport National Sur L ’ État Des Ressources Phytogénétiques Pour L ’ Alimentation Et L ’ Agriculture,” p. 28.
Duke, S. (2020) “Glyphosate: environmental fate and impact,” Weed Sci, 68(3), pp. 201-207. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2019.28.
Gaguan, J.S. and Nagal, C.J.C. (2025) “Advances in Soybean Cultivation and Utilization : Growth, Nutritional Significance, and Environmental Impacts,” Int. J. Res. Rev, 12(7) (July), pp. 213–224. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20250723.
Gnamkoulamba et al., (2018) “Prévalence et diversité des spores d champignons mycorhiziens arbusculaires en culture de riz sous les différents systèmes de culture de riz dans cinq zones agro-écologiques au Togo,” J. Appl. Biosci, 126, pp. 12647–12664. https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v126i1.3.
Heap, I. (2014) “Global perspective of herbicide-resistant weeds.,” Pest Manag. Sci., 70(9), pp. 1306-1315. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3696.
Jallow, M. F., Awadh, D. G., Albaho, M. S., Devi, V. Y., & Thomas, B.M. (2017) “Pesticide risk behaviors and factors influencing pesticide use among farmers in Kuwait.,” Sci. Total Environ, 574, pp. 490–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.085.
Kpienbaareh, D., Kansanga, M. M., Yiridoe, E., & Luginaah, I. (2022) “Exploring the drivers of herbicide use and risk perception among smallholder farmers in Ghana,” Gender Technol. Dev, 27(1), pp. 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2022.2092939.
Kumari, A. et al., (2024) “Integrating cover crops and herbicides for weed control in soybean,” Weed Technol, 38, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2024.24.
Magamana, E. et al., (2025) “Diversity and Biotopes of Edible Fungi in Ecological Zone II of Togo,” Asian J. Biol. Sci., 18(3), pp. 656–668. : https://doi.org/10.3923/ajbs.2025.656.668.
Mphande, W. et al., (2025) “Profiles of herbicide resistance in sub-saharan africa profils de résistance aux herbicides en afrique sub-saharienne weeds are a major limiting factor in crop production, causing colossal yield losses of up to 90 % globally under various circumstances,” Afr. Crop Sci. J., 33(3), pp. 289–307.https://doi.org/10.4314/acsj.v33i3.5.
Otieno, H.M.O. (2023) “A Mini-review of Herbicide Use in Sub-Saharan Africa : Current State, Potential Risks to Farmers, and Available Mitigation Strategies,” Innov. Agric, 6, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.25081/ia.2023-01.
Soltani, N. and Shropshire, C. (2022) “Soybean yield loss from delayed postemergence herbicide application based on weed height, days after emergence, accumulated crop heat units, and soybean growth stage,” Weed Technol, 36(3), pp. 403–408. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2022.36.
Tamru, Seneshaw Bart, Minten Dawit, Alemu Fantu, B. (2017) “The rapid expansion of herbicide use in smallholder agriculture in Ethiopia : Patterns, drivers, and implications,” Eur. J. Dev. Res, 29(3), pp. 628–647. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-017-0076-5.
Citations
|
|
|
